Constitutional Law 101 - States Rights and Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act

  1. Right to NOT spend money on nontherapeutic abortions for minor adults

  2. Maher v. Roe, 432 U.S. 464 (1977)
    Webster v. Reproductive Health Services, 492 U.S. 490, 508-511 (1989)
  3. Right to not be civilly sued in a federal court by a resident of the state

  4. Alden v. Maine, 527 U.S. 706 (1999)
  5. Right of sovereignty in courts of a foreign sovereign when not conducting commerce within the legislative jurisdiction of a foreign sovereign

  6. Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, 28 U.S.C. Sec.1602-1611 (Chapter 97)

    World-Wide Volkswagen v. Woodson, 444 U.S. 286 (1980)
  7. Governments or states may violate the Constitutional rights of persons in the context of their employment role as a public officers(Patronage exception)

  8. Rutan v. Republican Party of Illinois, 497 U.S. 62 (1990)

    Note: In order to protect and claim your Common Law Constitutional Rights, One must really know if they are in fact employed as a 'Public Officer'. Look into this, you may be very surprised by what you find! All Public Officers are Employees of the government. For now it will suffice to say that a Public Officer is defined in the U.S. Codes. All Public Officers are domiciled in Washington, DC. Are you sure you are not Domiciled or Reside in Washington DC? Have you voluntarily submitted a W4? Have you read all of the U.S. Codes? Do you know where the U.S. Codes are applicable? Do you know how you can give Consent to be Domiciled and Reside in the District of Columbia and NOT physically be there? Do you know about having a Domicile and Residence in one of the states of the Union? Have you ever heard of 'Separation of Powers' and why it is important to the lawful function of this Republic?

  9. Right to not subsidize the exercise of a fundamental right

  10. Regan v. Taxation with Representation of Wash, 461 U.S. 540, at 549 (1983) ("[A] legislature's decision not to subsidize the exercise of a fundamental right does not infringe the right.")
    Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S. 1 (1976)
    Cammarano v. United States, 358 U.S. 498 (1959)
    Harris v. McRae, 448 U.S. 297 at 317 (1980), n.19. ("A refusal to fund protected activity, without more,cannot be equated with the imposition of a `penalty' on that activity.")
  11. Right to search an automobile without a search warrant

  12. California v. Carney, 471 U.S. 386 (1985)
    Carroll v. United States, 267 U.S. 132 (1925)

    Research perfomed from 'without the United States'. [ 28 U.S. Code Sec. 1746 ]




Peace be unto you. Thank you for visiting!